AI Tools to Watch and How to Get the Most Out of Each

AI utilities evolve weekly, not yearly. Of all the tools I have tried and tested, I keep coming back to these four: NotebookLM, Claude 4, Lovable, and Perplexity. Each fills a different gap in the knowledge work stack, from research and long form reasoning to app building and real time search. The goal is not to collect more tools. The goal is to create a repeatable system that reduces noise and ships useful work.

1) NotebookLM, research and synthesis that stays organized

Why it matters
NotebookLM turns raw notes into outlines, explainers, and simple decks. It is most useful when you keep a single source of truth for a project and generate multiple outputs from it.

How to get the most out of it:

• One notebook per project.

• Open with a one line intent, “What am I producing and for whom.”

• Spin three outline options, pick one, archive the rest.

• Export slides or audio, then finish in your editor.
  

Streamlined workflow
Perplexity thread to a NotebookLM notebook, ask for three storylines with quotes and links. Move one outline to Slides and finish visuals manually.

2) Claude 4, deep reasoning on long inputs

Why it matters
Claude 4 handles long context, so it can hold the brief, the research, and the draft in one place. It excels at point by point critique and structured planning.

How to get the most out of it:

• Give Claude a job title and deliverable, for example “editorial reviewer, 900 word article.”

• Feed long documents in logical chunks with a short header that states purpose and audience.

• Use numbered checklists and acceptance criteria.

• For code, link a repo and ask for commit ready diffs.
  

Streamlined workflow
Paste the outline you chose in NotebookLM, add a sample paragraph, then ask Claude for a first draft that meets your criteria. Follow with a pass that cuts fluff by 15 percent.

3) Lovable for Dev, speed to working software

Why it matters
Lovable is a fast path from idea to a working web app with a connected code repo. It shines when you want to test a product concept with real users, not static mockups.

How to get the most out of it:

• Begin with a one sentence product vision, “Booking app for weekend tennis courts in Queens.”

• Enable GitHub sync and review pull requests locally.

• Turn on tests early and define a two week scope. Shipping beats tinkering.
  

Streamlined workflow
Describe the smallest version of your product, generate the app, run tests, then invite two target users. Capture friction points and feed those into the next prompt round.

4) Perplexity, fast answers with receipts

Why it matters
Perplexity is the quickest way to get a current, citation backed view on a question. It is ideal for market sizing checks, policy clarifications, and scanning what experts are saying now.

How to get the most out of it

• Start in Focus mode.

• Ask short follow ups that build on the previous answer.

• Save strong threads to a Collection and export citations into your notes.

• Cross check at least one key claim against a primary source before you publish.
  

Streamlined workflow
Run a three step chain, current landscape, competing claims, what data would falsify the strongest claim. Move that set into your project notebook and continue the work there.

A simple system that keeps you out of the noise

1. Start in Perplexity to gather sources worth reading.

2. Move the best links and quotes into a focused NotebookLM notebook and choose the story.

3. Draft with Claude using acceptance criteria that mirror your deliverable.

4. If you are building software, generate a minimal app in Lovable and test it with two users in the same week.

5. Close the loop. Document what shipped and archive everything else.

What comes next, tools or agents

Today we live with several siloed tools, each excellent at one job. That is workable if you keep a tight workflow. The trend, however, is toward agentic systems that can plan, call other tools, and take small actions on your behalf. Agents reduce handoffs that cause friction and lost context. They also bring risk if they operate without clear guardrails and verifiable logs.

My View

We will keep our favorite single purpose tools, but the front end will look more like an orchestrator. You will ask for an outcome, for example “Create a three page brief on inclusive LMS design, then draft a LinkedIn post, then open a pull request with a new case study section,” and an agent will call search, notes, writing, and repo tools in sequence. The next phase is not about one model to rule them all. It is about reliable coordination, strong permissions, and human review where it matters.

Next steps for the next 30 days

• Pick one real project and build a small workflow that uses all four tools end to end.

• Write two reusable prompts, reviewer and summarizer, plus one critic prompt. Store them where you can find them.

• Set output goals, not usage goals, for example one published article, one tested app concept, and one reusable dataset.

• Clean your data. Remove sensitive files from any tool that lacks clear retention controls.

• Keep a short changelog. Every Friday, log what shipped, what you learned, and what to change next week.

Hopes for the future

Agents that are auditable by default, with clear records of every tool call and data touch. I want simple ways to say no, for example do not email anyone or do not move money. I want better handoffs between tools, shared collections, shared context, and easy export. Most of all, I want these systems to help us do less busywork and more work that moves the needle.

Treat these products like specialists on a team. Give them a clear role, keep the workflow tight, and judge them by shipped outcomes. That is how we cut the noise and keep the signal high.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.