From Embodied to Disembodied: How EdTech Can Prepare the Future Workforce

“Do you work remotely, or are you in the office?”

That question captures more than just logistics. It’s a sign of how work itself has become detached from place, and that detachment has redrawn boundaries of labor, identity, and learning. The way we talk about work now signals a complex transformation that education can’t afford to ignore.

AI is beginning to blur the boundaries even further, transforming once physical jobs (such as medical diagnostics and construction planning) into digital or hybrid ones. As technology steadily pulls more traditionally embodied work into disembodied territory, we need to rethink how we prepare learners for a workforce where physical presence is no longer the defining feature of employment.

In doing so, one pressing question emerges: what kinds of skills will workers need to thrive in this new landscape?

Two Types of Work, One Big Question

First, what do we mean by embodied and disembodied work? I use those phrases as follows:

• Embodied jobs require physical presence. They often require hands-on skills and human interaction, and are prevalent in industries such as construction, healthcare, culinary, and electrical.
• Disembodied jobs are location independent. They often rely on cognitive and digital skills, and are common in fields like software development, analytics, content creation, or accounting.

Then there’s the middle ground: professors, who balance classroom and virtual instruction. Or journalists who perform research and conduct interviews on site as well as from their home offices. Hybrid roles offer many benefits as well as unique challenges for professionals (and the populations they serve), all of which highlight the complexity of preparing learners for a workforce where the categories are blurring.

Technology has always transformed labor; sometimes incrementally, other times rapidly and in waves that redefine entire economies. The Industrial Revolution shifted labor on a massive scale from farms to factories. Later, automation displaced factory workers while creating new categories of office jobs. Today, we’re seeing a new kind of shift: from embodied to disembodied work. The rise of generative and agentic AI are not only changing how we work, but where and whether physical presence is even required. This transformation is distinct from previous revolutions because it cuts across every sector, reshaping what it means to show up for work.

This evolution brings an urgent challenge for educators: how do we prepare learners to navigate these changes and train for roles that may not even exist yet?

When Skills Have Expiration Dates

I’m a proponent of upskilling and skill-based learning as pathways for upward mobility. But researchers at Harvard recently noted that the “’half-life of skills is shortening,’ as automation and artificial intelligence learn to take on tasks from factory work to coding.” That means today’s technical expertise may not hold tomorrow. And while AI may be helping to drive the shift from embodied to disembodied work, it may also present a threat to disembodied workers. To stay relevant, workers will need to continually refresh not only their technical fluency but also (and perhaps more importantly) their human skills: collaboration, adaptability, and communication.

This evolution reframes the idea of lifelong learning. It’s no longer about earning a single degree that will carry you through a lifelong career. It’s about ongoing, iterative skill renewal. Microcredentials, stackable certificates, and AI-personalized learning paths can help workers stay ahead of obsolescence. In other words, the future belongs not just to those with the right skills, but to those who know how to keep learning as skills evolve. 

What This Means for Education and Training

For educators, workforce trainers, and edtech leaders, the implications are urgent. Skill-based learning will remain vital for the future of work, regardless of whether that future leans toward embodied or disembodied roles. But we need to focus on what embodied and disembodied workers will really need.

For embodied jobs, human-centered skills—things like empathy, advanced problem solving, client or patient care, and nuanced communication—will rise in value as AI handles more of the technical aspects of work. Essentially, a higher level of emotional intelligence will become prioritized as the workforce is increasingly reshaped by AI and automation.

For disembodied jobs, digital collaboration, asynchronous communication, and self-advocacy will be highly valued. Much of this work happens invisibly, so learners must learn to make their impact visible through proactive updates, digital portfolios, and clear communication, especially with supervisors.

Across both spaces, adaptability, resilience, and human reasoning will define success. Technology can enhance skills, but it can’t replicate human judgement or connection. So that’s where education must lead.

Designing for a Hybrid Future

As the future trends toward disembodied work, our learning and training may follow the same trajectory. EdTech now stands at the intersection of these needs, uniquely positioned to design learning that bridges technical fluency and human capability. Simulation-based learning and VR/AR environments that mimic workplace scenarios are dynamic, impactful, and fun ways for learners to improve their skill portfolio. For the “harder” skill side, blended training models such as augmented reality overlays in medical training, virtual construction site walk-throughs, or AI-enabled safety modules can supplement hands-on learning, keep learning scalable, and offer experiential learning.

The transition from embodied to disembodied jobs is not binary. It’s a spectrum, and many careers will continue to exist somewhere in between. That makes it even more important that education systems prepare learners not just for specific tasks, but for flexibility across contexts.

• Skill-based microcredentials can help learners prove competencies that transfer across jobs.
• Simulation-based training can give learners practice in both digital and physical environments.
• Soft skills must be built into curricula, not treated as “extras.”
• A standardized skills taxonomy that is universally applied across all jobs could streamline the hiring process and improve the talent pipeline.

The future of work will need more than technical proficiency—it will demand confidence navigating environments that are sometimes embodied, sometimes disembodied, and often both at once. As EdTech leaders, we have the opportunity to design learning experiences that prepare people for this shift. 

Moving Forward

Ultimately, the shift from embodied to disembodied work isn’t about choosing one path over the other. It’s about preparing learners to move fluidly between them. That preparation has to be lifelong, supported by systems that evolve as quickly as the work itself. The next revolution in learning isn’t about technology; it’s about intentional design, and how we use EdTech tools to make learning more equitable, adaptive, and human-centered. If we get it right, we won’t just keep pace with the future of work. We’ll define it. It’s time to build the learning systems the next generation deserves.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.