Lab Safety Requirements and School Administrators
Now that you are aware of the legal safety standards and have accepted better professional safety practices regarding science instructional space laboratories and classrooms in your schools covered in Part 1 of this series, let’s explore the critical requirements for you as the site administrator/supervisor to ensure that you are meeting your regulatory compliance requirements. Be aware that these requirements are not suggestions or optional but enforceable regulations under legal safety standards. Remember that as the building principal or supervisor, you are ultimately responsible for occupational health and safety on-site and in the field (school-sanctioned events/trips/excursions), and there is potential for shared liability in the event of an injury or an accident.
As a school employee, you are responsible for these critical components of the safety program:
If you are unaware of these requirements, you need to familiarize yourself with these compliance requirements immediately and develop a progressive plan to implement each of these criteria in your school in order to meet mandatory legal objectives and maintain a safer instructional space for teaching and learning. This is not optional — this is your responsibility as the school administrator. Here are some real-world examples to help illustrate the importance of these criteria and how these impact the school building administrator/supervisor.
It is important to recognize that even if you claim you were unaware of these regulations and accountabilities, it is not an excuse or justification when an accident or injury results.
A science teacher performs an activity involving methanol in the laboratory as a demonstration to entertain the students, unknown to the department chair and/or principal. Due to the properties of methyl alcohol, flame jetting occurs, and several students and the teacher are severely burned. No PPE or other safety measures, such as the use of a safety shield or conducting the demonstration in the fume hood, were utilized. This activity had been performed previously to generate student interest in science. The resulting lawsuit involved shared liability, including the chemistry teacher, department chair, school principal, school district Chemical Hygiene Officer, Science Supervisor, and Superintendent of schools. Multiple failures exist in this scenario, including duty of care, hazard analysis & risk assessment, lack of communication about planned activities, appropriate safety training, PPE, and not maintaining a safer work environment (laboratory), resulting in shared liability costing millions of dollars and resulting surgeries and lifetime scars for the students and chemistry teacher. This was entirely preventable under appropriate employee training and supervision!
A physics teacher was having students study projectiles and forces involving the use of model rockets. Students built the rockets using kits in the science instructional lab space. The teacher then had students go to the soccer field to test their calculated projectile trajectories. Rockets were placed on a launch rod anchored in the ground. The teacher didn’t bother doing a potential hazard analysis and resulting risk assessment. Instead, just provided a generic “be careful” statement.
One student stepped up to the launch rod while talking to another student. He turned his head, which came in contact with the end of the launch rod, impaling his right eyeball. In a fraction of a second – his sight in that eye was permanently destroyed. Fast forward, the student’s parents sued the teacher and went up the “food” chain to the Superintendent. The teacher failed to mention the safety actions needed for this activity, including appropriate personal protective equipment, distance for observers from the launch site, and more. Under duty or standard of care, the teacher and the administration/supervisors involved in shared liability were primarily liable.
Under OSHA, employees can directly report unsafe working conditions. OSHA will either make an unannounced visit to the workplace or send a registered letter to the school’s employer requesting information about the working conditions as was reported by the employee.
Remember that NOT knowing a safety regulation or compliance requirement is no excuse when an accident or injury occurs. The supervisor of the school and others, including department chairs, district officials, and classroom teachers, are often included in ‘shared liability claims,’ and the duty of care clauses and accountability under the ‘prudent person test’ are used in this determination. Working collaboratively, we can make schools safer through understanding and recognition of the laws and procedures in place involving continuous appropriate safety training for all, maintaining an organized science department, minimizing chemical concentrations and volumes used, conducting safety inspections, using student safety acknowledgment forms, maintaining accurate inventory records for chemicals and equipment as well as keeping these areas secured at all times to prevent unauthorized access will go a long way towards having safer teaching and learning instructional space in your school buildings.
Safety First. Accidents Last. Stay safer!
Discover how AI and gamification transform education by personalizing learning, boosting engagement, and driving student…
Discover 10 proven strategies to prevent teacher burnout, reduce stress, manage workload, and boost well-being…
Discover 10 effective ways schools can engage parents in understanding AI in education, building trust…
Discover the latest K-12 education trends in AI, cybersecurity, safety, and communication in edCircuit’s Weekly…
Discover effective parent communication strategies for schools in 2024. Learn how to simplify updates, reduce…
Discover why K–12 schools are top targets for cyber attacks as hackers exploit sensitive data,…