“Making sure each student is learning at a high level in a Differentiated Classroom is key”
High Expectations
First, rigor expects each student to learn at high levels. Having high expectations starts with the decision that every student possesses the potential to be his or her best, no matter what.
Almost everyone I talk with says, “I have high expectations for our students.” Sometimes that is evidenced by the behaviors in the school; at other times actions don’t match the words.
It is also important to look at how I respond to student questions. It is common for teachers who ask higher-level questions to accept low-level responses from students. In rigorous classrooms teachers push students to respond at high levels. They ask extending questions. If a student does not know the answer, the teacher continues to probe and guide the student to an appropriate answer, rather than moving on to the next student.
Supporting Students to Learn at High Levels
High expectations are important, but the most rigorous schools assure that each student is supported so he or she can learn at high levels, the second part of our definition. It is essential that teachers design lessons that move students to more challenging work while simultaneously providing ongoing scaffolding to support students learning as they reach those higher levels.
Providing additional scaffolding throughout lessons is one of the most important ways to support students. This can occur in a variety of ways, but it requires that teachers ask themselves during every step of their lesson, “What extra support might my students need?”
Ensuring Students Demonstrate Learning at High Levels
Rigor and Differentiation
Many teachers have incorporated Differentiated Instruction in their classrooms. Developed by Carol Ann Tomlinson, the approach recommends that instruction be adjusted for small groups of students based on their readiness, interest or learning profile. Based on those criteria, teachers should adapt their content (curriculum), process (instruction), or product (assessment) in order to meet those needs. Notice how those adaptations match with our definition of rigor.
Differentiated Instruction provides customized instruction for different levels of students. However, a common criticism of Differentiated Instruction is that, by adjusting instruction for struggling students, teachers lower the level of rigor. By overlaying our definition of rigor onto the model, we can ensure rigor for all students.
For example, we might choose to adjust the content for struggling students. Perhaps we are teaching a lesson on Martin Luther King, Jr. and we choose a different, easier text for struggling students. We can ensure rigor and high expectations by incorporating higher order questions, albeit on lower content, or by asking students to read grade level text after they read the easier text. By reading the easier text first, they are able to move back to the grade level text with your support, because they have built prior knowledge and vocabulary skills (a strategy called Layering Meaning).
Or, we might adjust our process, or support. Let’s say we are teaching how to solve math word problems. We can adjust our support by providing a graphic organizer to struggling students. Not all students need this structure, so we accommodate those who do need support with an additional instructional strategy.
A Final Note
Incorporating Differentiated Instruction in your classroom does not mean you have to lower the level of rigor for your struggling students. However, we must be intentional about how we adjust our expectations, support, and demonstration of learning options so that we include rigor. Books are available at https://www.routledge.com/collections/10881. Check out my new book: Rigor and Assessment in the Classroom
- EdSurge – Is Homework Compatible With Personalized Learning?
- Education Week – Differentiated Instruction: A Primer
- Teach HUB – 22 Ways to Add Rigor to Your Classroom