Education Vendors arrive at conference season with packed calendars, booth goals, and high expectations. Events like FETC, AASA, TCEA, SXSW EDU, and CoSN bring together thousands of educators and vendors in a single space over a few intense days.
But schools don’t buy the way most industries do.
Educators aren’t browsing for quick wins. District leaders aren’t making purchasing decisions between sessions. And teachers often approach booths cautiously, shaped by years of tools that promised more than they delivered.
Conference season isn’t about winning people over in a single interaction. It’s about starting conversations that feel credible enough to continue after the conference ends.
Many education vendors open with a product description. That’s usually where things go wrong.
If the first thing an educator hears is a pitch, they immediately go into listening mode instead of conversation mode. You can see it happen. The body language changes. The eye contact fades. The interaction becomes polite but shallow.
A better opening sounds more like curiosity than confidence:
“What role do you play in your district?”
“What made you stop by today?”
“What’s something your team is wrestling with right now?”
These questions signal respect. They also tell educators that you understand that their context matters more than your features.
If the problem they describe doesn’t align with what you offer, that’s not a failure. It’s a chance to build trust by avoiding a forced fit.
One of the fastest ways to derail a conference conversation is to focus only on titles.
Education vendors often ask, “Are you the decision maker?” That question can feel dismissive, even if it’s well-intentioned.
In reality, school and district decisions are shared. While a superintendent or CIO may approve a purchase, the path to that decision usually includes:
Teachers piloting tools in classrooms
Instructional coaches providing feedback
IT teams evaluating security and integration
Curriculum leaders assessing alignment
A teacher who feels unheard can quietly stop momentum. An IT leader with unanswered concerns can stall progress for months.
When someone says, “I’m not the one who decides,” the most productive response is curiosity:
“Who else weighs in?”
“What usually matters most in that process?”
“What questions tend to come up?”
Respecting influence is often how access is earned.
Here’s a reality education vendors sometimes forget: many educators are browsing, not buying.
They might be:
Researching ideas for the next budget cycle
Attending sessions between meetings
Exploring what’s new without intent to adopt
Looking for inspiration, not solutions
Pushing for next steps in these moments can feel uncomfortable and unnecessary. Educators notice when vendors rush the conversation.
A better approach is to be useful without expectation:
Share a trend you’re seeing across districts
Offer a resource or article
Suggest a question they should ask any vendor in your space
When educators feel no pressure, they’re more likely to remember the interaction positively.
Educators are experienced consumers of edtech marketing. They’ve seen tools that promised to save time, improve outcomes, and “just work.”
They’ve also lived through implementations that required far more training, support, and change management than expected.
Education vendors build credibility when they talk honestly about:
What implementation actually looks like
Where adoption can stall
The level of support required
Situations where their solution might not be ideal
Saying “this takes work” doesn’t scare schools away. Pretending it doesn’t exist does.
Honesty is one of the fastest ways to differentiate yourself in a crowded exhibit hall.
Conference halls are full of buzzwords. Educators hear them all.
What resonates more is language grounded in reality:
Teacher workload
Student engagement
Data privacy concerns
Budget cycles
Sustainability over time
Instead of listing features, connect your solution to lived experience:
“Teachers tell us this saves them planning time.”
“Districts usually start with a small pilot.”
“This works best when there’s coaching support.”
Concrete examples feel real. Abstract promises feel forgettable.
What happens after the conference often determines whether the conversation continues.
Effective follow-up is personal and patient:
Reference something specific you discussed
Acknowledge busy school schedules
Offer next steps without urgency
Ineffective follow-up feels automated:
Generic emails
Immediate pricing pushes
Multiple messages in the same week
A short note that says, “It was great talking about your district’s priorities. Happy to reconnect when timing makes sense,” respects how education operates.
For education vendors, conference season isn’t about booth traffic or badge scans.
It’s about trust.
Vendors who listen closely, respect every role in the decision-making process, and communicate honestly stand out quickly. They’re the ones educators remember weeks later, when real conversations begin.
When the interaction feels human, the relationship has room to grow.
And in education, that’s where real progress starts.
Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.
Deepfakes in schools are no longer an abstract concern for educators. The substitute teacher has…
Data Privacy in Schools is often talked about at the district office or in IT…
Safer STEM Spaces start with recognizing a simple truth. Instruction has changed faster than many…
The Science of Reading is a vast, interdisciplinary body of research that explains how children…
Immersive Learning is no longer a novelty reserved for occasional demonstrations or special events. In…
Open Educational Resources (OER) are no longer a niche idea in education. They have become…