by Maggie Haberman
The last time she ran for president, Hillary Rodham Clinton did not have to take a position on the Common Core, Race to the Top or teacher evaluations in tenure decisions.
She won the endorsement of one of the nation’s largest teachers’ unions in 2007 after deploring the use of standardized tests and the underfunding of the No Child Left Behind law by President George W. Bush’s administration.
Now, as she prepares for a likely second run at the White House, Mrs. Clinton — who largely avoided domestic policy when she was secretary of state — is re-entering the fray like a Rip Van Winkle for whom the terrain on education standards has shifted markedly, with deep new fissures in the Democratic Party.
Read the rest of the article on the New York Times website.
College decision next steps become urgent each February as acceptance letters turn anticipation into action.…
This Black History Month, we celebrate African Americans who shaped safety in science education, shaping…
Real-world learning often starts with a moment that feels unfamiliar to students used to traditional…
AI in K-5 classrooms is becoming part of everyday learning, and you can see it…
When our students started saying, “Math is my favorite subject,” we knew something big had…
In today’s rapidly evolving educational landscape, technology is no longer a support function—it’s a strategic…