by Maggie Haberman
The last time she ran for president, Hillary Rodham Clinton did not have to take a position on the Common Core, Race to the Top or teacher evaluations in tenure decisions.
She won the endorsement of one of the nation’s largest teachers’ unions in 2007 after deploring the use of standardized tests and the underfunding of the No Child Left Behind law by President George W. Bush’s administration.
Now, as she prepares for a likely second run at the White House, Mrs. Clinton — who largely avoided domestic policy when she was secretary of state — is re-entering the fray like a Rip Van Winkle for whom the terrain on education standards has shifted markedly, with deep new fissures in the Democratic Party.
Read the rest of the article on the New York Times website.
Reach education decision-makers without ads—and more importantly, without being ignored. Because here’s the reality: Most…
Assessment in the AI era is rapidly becoming one of the most disruptive shifts in…
Student attention in schools is quickly becoming one of the defining challenges of modern education…
What 15 episodes taught us about school safety is this: safety isn’t defined by policies,…
Education thought leadership often begins with a quiet frustration that exists across classrooms, district offices,…
COPPA in schools is reshaping how educators use technology, protect student data, and build trust…