How the Trade War Is Rewriting School Budgets

In spring 2025, school districts across the United States have been reworking their budgets to respond to rising costs driven by federal tariffs. Under the Trump administration’s renewed trade strategy, expanded Section 301 tariffs and “America First” procurement directives have targeted Chinese-made electronics, industrial materials, and educational supplies—raising costs for devices, school infrastructure, and instructional materials.

However, on May 12, 2025, the U.S. and China announced a 90-day tariff reduction agreement, easing some economic pressure. The U.S. is lowering tariffs on many Chinese imports—from rates as high as 145% down to approximately 30%—while China is cutting tariffs on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%. While the move is a temporary relief, many school districts had already made difficult decisions under the earlier pricing conditions—and concerns remain about long-term uncertainty.

Price Spikes Before the Pause

Before the truce, the tariff expansions affected:

• Chromebooks and tablets

• Interactive displays and projectors

• Wi-Fi and networking equipment

• HVAC components and steel

• Classroom furniture and paper supplies

According to Canalys and other industry analysts, Chromebook shipment costs rose substantially in Q1 2025, driven by these tariffs and ongoing supply chain pressure. Many districts—particularly those winding down ESSER funding—faced difficult purchasing decisions earlier this year, including delaying or scaling back one-to-one device rollouts.

Though the tariff reductions may help stabilize pricing for future orders, existing procurement delays and inflated contracts remain locked in for many districts.

Infrastructure Challenges Persist

Rising costs have also hit school construction. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers’ 2025 School Facilities Report Card, many school infrastructure projects have been delayed or re-scoped due to volatility in material costs. Steel, insulation, and HVAC equipment were among the most affected categories under tariff policies earlier in the year.

While the 90-day pause may help ease new bid costs, school construction timelines—and bond-funded projects—typically span years. Budgeting and procurement decisions made in Q1 2025 under higher tariff rates will continue to shape district spending well into the 2025–26 school year.

Equity Concerns Remain

As with most fiscal shocks in education, the impact has not been evenly distributed. High-poverty and rural districts have been hit harder. Even with the temporary tariff relief, districts serving lower-income communities may struggle to course-correct unless additional federal or state-level supports are introduced.

Policy and Procurement Adjustments

With the 90-day tariff reduction agreement now in place, some state procurement offices (including those in Illinois and Oregon) are revisiting bid timelines and vendor flexibility rules to take advantage of temporary pricing changes. Still, many administrators remain cautious, viewing the agreement as a short-term political maneuver rather than a permanent reset.

Vendor Reactions and Strategy

Many educational vendors—especially in EdTech—had already begun adapting to the tariff environment:

• Nearshoring: Shifting production to Mexico or Southeast Asia to avoid direct U.S.–China channels.

• Digital-first distribution: Emphasizing curriculum products that eliminate print and freight costs.

• Bundled service contracts: Offering fixed pricing over multi-year deals to give districts predictability.

These strategies are expected to continue regardless of short-term tariff reductions, as uncertainty remains a defining feature of the 2025 trade environment.

What Districts Should Do Now

Even with the temporary easing of tariffs, districts should continue to:

• Monitor supply chain pricing for key materials and technology

• Reassess contracts signed in Q1 2025 to determine renegotiation options

• Participate in state and national advocacy efforts focused on long-term procurement reform

• Document tariff-related cost impacts to build a case for emergency aid or legislative relief

Conclusion: A Pause, Not a Solution

The May 2025 U.S.–China tariff truce offers momentary relief for education systems already under stress. But the 90-day window is short, and most school procurement cycles—and budget planning horizons—extend well beyond it.

For school leaders and policymakers, the deeper challenge remains:

• How can we build an education system that is resilient to geopolitical shocks?

Until tariffs and trade rules more explicitly recognize the public good of education, schools will continue navigating a global economy that often treats them like just another buyer in the marketplace.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.