Should K-12 Schools Run Year-Round?

As educators, parents, and policymakers seek to address learning loss, mental health crises, and equity gaps in American education, one idea continues to reemerge: year-round schooling. The traditional academic calendar—built on a long summer break—is being reconsidered by a growing number of districts, researchers, and lawmakers. With academic, economic, and social pressures mounting, is it time for the U.S. to adopt a year-round model?

What Is Year-Round Schooling?

Year-round schooling redistributes the standard 180 instructional days across the entire calendar year. Instead of a long summer vacation, students receive shorter, more frequent breaks. A common format is the 45/15 model, where students attend school for 45 days and then take a 15-day break. Other variations include 60/20 or 90/30 plans. These adjustments help maintain a consistent academic rhythm and minimize the cognitive setbacks associated with prolonged time away from school.

It’s important to note that year-round schooling does not mean more school days. Rather, it’s about how those days are arranged. This approach aims to improve student retention, decrease the need for extensive review periods after long breaks, and foster more balanced workloads for both students and teachers. It also opens doors to staggered schedules in overcrowded districts, allowing better utilization of facilities without increasing infrastructure costs.

Where It’s Happening

Approximately 3,000 schools across the U.S. operate on some form of year-round calendar. Districts in Bardstown, Kentucky; Rock Island, Illinois; and Socorro, Texas have adopted variations of the model. In California, several districts—including those in Los Angeles and San Diego—have piloted or implemented year-round calendars to address overcrowding and support academic consistency. North Carolina and Arizona also have numerous schools, particularly in urban areas, that follow modified year-round schedules.

Although year-round schooling is still far from mainstream, legislative developments in various states suggest a growing openness to exploring calendar reform. Discussions about learning recovery post-pandemic have fueled interest in more flexible academic calendars.

Proposing a Mid-Year Break: July as the New December

One idea gaining traction among proponents is establishing a mid-year break similar in length and tone to the existing winter break. This July break—spanning three weeks or more—would allow students and staff a period of recovery during peak summer heat without losing instructional momentum. This approach maintains the benefits of year-round schooling while preserving some semblance of a traditional summer vacation.

A July break would provide a predictable and restful pause in the academic year, supporting family vacations, enrichment camps, and professional development for teachers. It could also be strategically timed to coincide with other societal rhythms, such as national holidays or business slowdowns, allowing communities to coordinate activities and resources effectively. By formalizing this break, schools could reduce the stigma of “always being in session,” while still achieving the consistency that research shows benefits students.

Benefits of Year-Round Schooling

1. Academic Gains and Testing Readiness

Students often lose academic ground over the summer, especially in low-income communities. Year-round schooling helps maintain academic continuity, potentially leading to improved standardized test performance. Frequent, shorter breaks also allow teachers to assess students’ progress and adjust instruction in real time.

2. Student and Educator Wellbeing

Shorter instructional cycles reduce burnout. Students and teachers alike benefit from regular mental health breaks throughout the year. Unlike a single long summer holiday, periodic rests may help sustain engagement and enthusiasm.

3. Better Support Services

For many families, schools are vital lifelines. They provide two to three meals per day, safe environments, and access to mental health support. When schools close for the summer, these services vanish. A year-round calendar ensures more consistent access, especially for vulnerable populations.

4. Aligning with Economic Norms

Most businesses operate year-round. Parents who work full-time often face challenges securing child care during long school breaks. Year-round school schedules can align better with modern work-life demands, making life easier for working families.

Challenges and Costs

1. Operational Expenses

Running schools year-round can increase utility, maintenance, and staffing costs. Air conditioning during summer months, extended food service operations, and additional custodial services all contribute to a higher budget.

2. Family Scheduling and Tradition

Families are accustomed to summer vacations, and shifting away from that model can disrupt long-standing traditions, travel plans, and summer camp participation.

3. Testing and Curriculum Pacing

Standardized testing schedules are built around the traditional calendar. Moving to a year-round model would require rethinking assessment timing and curriculum pacing, which could complicate state and federal education compliance.

Summer, Safety, and Equity

Long summer breaks can exacerbate inequality. In some communities, children without access to enrichment programs or safe environments are left at risk. Idle time during summer months has been linked to increased juvenile crime rates and reduced access to essential services like nutrition, counseling, and health care.

Year-round schooling helps keep students engaged and off the streets, reducing exposure to crime and providing supervision. For many, school is not just a place of learning but a sanctuary. Consistent school schedules ensure that at-risk students remain connected to a support system that includes meals, mentors, counselors, and academic structure—all of which are critical for long-term success.

What About Homeschooling, Private, and Charter Schools?

Homeschooling families often operate on year-round schedules, adjusting learning to accommodate family needs, vacations, and student progress. This flexibility is frequently cited as one of homeschooling’s strengths, and it illustrates how alternative schedules can benefit personalized education.

Charter schools, which often have more autonomy in designing academic programs, may also embrace extended calendars or year-round models. For example, many high-performing charters serving disadvantaged populations use longer school years to provide more instructional time and reduce learning gaps.

Private schools, particularly those with religious affiliations or specialized academic goals, also experiment with year-round or trimester-based calendars. These institutions often have the flexibility to innovate in ways that traditional public schools may find challenging due to regulatory or union constraints.

Policymaker Perspectives

Policymakers increasingly view year-round education as a potential remedy for systemic issues in American schooling. In the wake of COVID-19, there has been heightened interest in exploring ways to combat learning loss and ensure educational equity. Legislative efforts in states like California, North Carolina, and Illinois are considering the expansion of instructional hours and alternatives to the traditional academic year.

However, year-round schooling introduces a host of implementation questions. Funding is a major hurdle; many districts already operate under tight budgets and may struggle to cover the added costs. Policymakers must also consider labor agreements, transportation logistics, and community readiness.

Community engagement is critical. Policymakers must weigh the perspectives of all stakeholders—including parents, educators, students, and employers—when crafting legislation or pilot programs. They also need to ensure that any new model includes adequate support structures, such as meal services, child care partnerships, and teacher training.

The success of any shift toward year-round education depends on thoughtful planning, clear communication, and flexible policy frameworks that accommodate the diverse needs of America’s school communities.

One Size Doesn’t Fit All

The move toward year-round schooling is not about forcing a single solution on every district. Instead, it’s about providing options that meet the needs of diverse communities. A reimagined calendar with a meaningful July break could offer the academic, emotional, and social stability today’s students need. But it must be weighed carefully against costs, logistics, and local values.

Education is not just about instruction—it’s about access, equity, and opportunity. Whether year-round schooling becomes the new norm or remains a niche alternative, the goal must remain the same: giving every student the best possible chance to succeed.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.