The Decline of International Students in Higher Education

International students have long been essential to the identity, economy, and academic rigor of schools and universities around the world. Yet today, the pipeline is thinning. In the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and parts of Europe, higher education institutions are reporting stagnating or falling international enrollment numbers. Meanwhile, some secondary schools that once catered to globally mobile families are feeling the shift too.

This is not just a blip—it’s a sustained decline with far-reaching implications.

Section 1: By the Numbers – The Decline in Context

• In the U.S., new international student enrollment fell by over 40% during the 2020–2021 academic year. This steep decline was largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted travel, closed embassies, and pushed most instruction online. Compounding this, policies under President Trump created an environment seen by many as unwelcoming to international students, through travel bans, visa restrictions, and threats to rescind student visas for those taking online classes. While some recovery followed, the rebound has not fully returned to pre-2019 levels as of 2025.

• Australia saw international student numbers fall from 956,000 in 2019 to 570,000 in 2022.

• The U.K. experienced a post-pandemic surge due to changes in visa policy, but numbers have begun to drop again in 2024 due to stricter dependent visa rules.

The decline is most evident at the undergraduate level and in non-STEM fields, though graduate programs are beginning to feel the pressure too. At the high school level, international boarding schools in North America and Europe are seeing enrollment shrink or plateau.

Section 2: What’s Driving the Drop?

1. Visa and Immigration Policy: Shifts in government policy play a major role. From reduced work rights post-graduation to increased scrutiny of student visa applications, barriers are going up.

   U.S. Policy Shifts: Trump vs. Biden (and the Return of Trump in 2025)

   Under the Trump administration (2017–2021), international student policy was marked by restriction and unpredictability. Key changes included:

   • A 2017 travel ban affecting students from several Muslim-majority countries

   • Tightened H-1B visa rules and increased denials

   • A proposed rule to limit student visa duration to fixed terms

   • Threats in 2020 to revoke visas for students whose courses moved fully online due to the pandemic

   These policies led to a decline in enrollment and a perception that the U.S. was no longer a welcoming destination.

   During President Biden’s term (2021–2025), there was a notable shift:

   • The travel ban was rescinded

   • DHS guidance allowed international students to maintain visa status with hybrid or online learning

   • The Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, critical for international STEM graduates, remained intact and stable

   Biden’s administration emphasized inclusivity and global engagement, which helped stabilize enrollment temporarily. However, it was not enough to fully reverse the longer-term trends.

   With President Trump returning to the office, the policy climate has again shifted. Early signals suggest a renewed emphasis on immigration restrictions, tighter visa scrutiny, and a rollback of some Biden-era provisions. This new phase has already begun to influence perception abroad, with concerns over long-term stability and access resurfacing for prospective international students.

   Contrast with Other Countries:

   • Canada maintained post-graduation work rights but introduced caps on international enrollment in some provinces due to housing pressures.

   • In Australia, international student numbers dropped from around 756,700 in 2019 to about 619,000 by the end of 2022, representing a decline of approximately 18%.

   • The U.K. expanded post-study work visas in 2021 but scaled back dependent visas in 2024, prompting a shift in student demographics.

   • Germany and the Netherlands remain relatively open but are hitting capacity constraints in housing and services.

2. Cost of Education and Living: Inflation, rising tuition, and housing shortages make studying abroad less financially viable for many families.

3. Geopolitical Tensions: Strained relations between major sending and receiving countries (e.g., China-U.S., India-Canada) have introduced risk and uncertainty.

4. Post-Pandemic Effects: Remote learning devalued the traditional on-campus experience. Many students are rethinking whether studying abroad is worth the cost.

5. Increased Competition: More countries are developing their domestic education sectors or attracting students with lower-cost, high-quality programs (e.g., Germany, Netherlands, UAE).

6. Safety and Social Climate: Perceptions of racism, violence, or instability in destination countries weigh heavily in decision-making.

Section 3: Impact on Higher Education Institutions

• Revenue Shortfalls: International students often pay full tuition and subsidize domestic students. Their absence leaves financial holes, especially for mid-tier and private institutions.

• Academic Diversity: Fewer global perspectives in classrooms weaken the intellectual ecosystem.

• Research and Innovation: International graduate students, especially in STEM, are a backbone of lab research. Their decline impacts output and innovation.

• Enrollment Strategy Shifts: Universities are rethinking recruitment, increasing outreach to domestic underrepresented groups or exploring transnational education.

Section 4: Impact on Domestic Students

• Reduced Campus Services: Budget shortfalls lead to cuts in programs, services, or faculty hiring.

• Fewer Opportunities for Cultural Exchange: International students broaden peer learning and expose domestic students to global networks.

• Increased Competition at Home: As fewer students study abroad, domestic institutions may face enrollment surges, especially in top-tier programs.

Section 5: What About High Schools?

International K–12 education has also felt the tremors:

• Boarding schools report drops in Chinese and Middle Eastern enrollment.

• Some private schools are shifting marketing to target expat families already abroad.

• Curriculum and extracurricular diversity may decline without international voices.

The ripple effects are not just academic. For rural or suburban private schools, international students often kept dorms full and programs funded.

Section 6: Looking Ahead – Strategies for 2025 and Beyond

As institutions brace for continued uncertainty, here are key strategies education leaders are considering:

• Diversify Recruitment Markets: Instead of over-relying on a few countries like China or India, schools are expanding outreach to Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Central Asia to build more resilient pipelines.

• Strengthen Domestic Enrollment: By expanding access, affordability, and outreach to underserved domestic populations, institutions can stabilize enrollment even as international numbers fluctuate.

• Invest in Online and Hybrid Models: Online pathways, dual degrees, and hybrid programs offer global access without requiring full relocation—making programs more affordable and flexible.

• Establish Satellite and Partner Campuses Abroad: U.S., U.K., and Australian universities are increasing partnerships with institutions in other countries to deliver education where students are.

• Enhance Student Support Services: From visa guidance and housing help to inclusion and mental health programs, building a reputation for care and safety is key to attracting and retaining students.

• Advocate Collectively for Policy Change: Universities and consortia are lobbying governments to protect OPT, streamline visa processing, and recognize international education as a national asset.

Conclusion: A Turning Point for International Education

The decline in international student enrollment isn’t a temporary trend—it’s a turning point. Education leaders, policymakers, and institutions must now adapt to a more competitive, fragmented, and cautious global education market. Whether this challenge becomes a crisis or a catalyst will depend on the choices made today.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.