EdCircuit Staff 
Table of Contents
Education Vendors arrive at conference season with packed calendars, booth goals, and high expectations. Events like FETC, AASA, TCEA, SXSW EDU, and CoSN bring together thousands of educators and vendors in a single space over a few intense days.
But schools don’t buy the way most industries do.
Educators aren’t browsing for quick wins. District leaders aren’t making purchasing decisions between sessions. And teachers often approach booths cautiously, shaped by years of tools that promised more than they delivered.
Conference season isn’t about winning people over in a single interaction. It’s about starting conversations that feel credible enough to continue after the conference ends.
The First 30 Seconds Matter More Than the Demo
Many education vendors open with a product description. That’s usually where things go wrong.
If the first thing an educator hears is a pitch, they immediately go into listening mode instead of conversation mode. You can see it happen. The body language changes. The eye contact fades. The interaction becomes polite but shallow.
A better opening sounds more like curiosity than confidence:
-
“What role do you play in your district?”
-
“What made you stop by today?”
-
“What’s something your team is wrestling with right now?”
These questions signal respect. They also tell educators that you understand that their context matters more than your features.
If the problem they describe doesn’t align with what you offer, that’s not a failure. It’s a chance to build trust by avoiding a forced fit.
Decision Makers Matter, but Influencers Shape Reality
One of the fastest ways to derail a conference conversation is to focus only on titles.
Education vendors often ask, “Are you the decision maker?” That question can feel dismissive, even if it’s well-intentioned.
In reality, school and district decisions are shared. While a superintendent or CIO may approve a purchase, the path to that decision usually includes:
-
Teachers piloting tools in classrooms
-
Instructional coaches providing feedback
-
IT teams evaluating security and integration
-
Curriculum leaders assessing alignment
A teacher who feels unheard can quietly stop momentum. An IT leader with unanswered concerns can stall progress for months.
When someone says, “I’m not the one who decides,” the most productive response is curiosity:
-
“Who else weighs in?”
-
“What usually matters most in that process?”
-
“What questions tend to come up?”
Respecting influence is often how access is earned.
Not Everyone at a Conference Is Shopping
Here’s a reality education vendors sometimes forget: many educators are browsing, not buying.
They might be:
-
Researching ideas for the next budget cycle
-
Attending sessions between meetings
-
Exploring what’s new without intent to adopt
-
Looking for inspiration, not solutions
Pushing for next steps in these moments can feel uncomfortable and unnecessary. Educators notice when vendors rush the conversation.
A better approach is to be useful without expectation:
-
Share a trend you’re seeing across districts
-
Offer a resource or article
-
Suggest a question they should ask any vendor in your space
When educators feel no pressure, they’re more likely to remember the interaction positively.
Avoid Overpromising. Schools Have Heard It Before.
Educators are experienced consumers of edtech marketing. They’ve seen tools that promised to save time, improve outcomes, and “just work.”
They’ve also lived through implementations that required far more training, support, and change management than expected.
Education vendors build credibility when they talk honestly about:
-
What implementation actually looks like
-
Where adoption can stall
-
The level of support required
-
Situations where their solution might not be ideal
Saying “this takes work” doesn’t scare schools away. Pretending it doesn’t exist does.
Honesty is one of the fastest ways to differentiate yourself in a crowded exhibit hall.
Speak Like a Partner, Not a Pitch Deck
Conference halls are full of buzzwords. Educators hear them all.
What resonates more is language grounded in reality:
-
Teacher workload
-
Student engagement
-
Data privacy concerns
-
Budget cycles
-
Sustainability over time
Instead of listing features, connect your solution to lived experience:
-
“Teachers tell us this saves them planning time.”
-
“Districts usually start with a small pilot.”
-
“This works best when there’s coaching support.”
Concrete examples feel real. Abstract promises feel forgettable.
Follow Up Like a Person, Not a Campaign
What happens after the conference often determines whether the conversation continues.
Effective follow-up is personal and patient:
-
Reference something specific you discussed
-
Acknowledge busy school schedules
-
Offer next steps without urgency
Ineffective follow-up feels automated:
-
Generic emails
-
Immediate pricing pushes
-
Multiple messages in the same week
A short note that says, “It was great talking about your district’s priorities. Happy to reconnect when timing makes sense,” respects how education operates.
Conference Success Is Measured in Trust
For education vendors, conference season isn’t about booth traffic or badge scans.
It’s about trust.
Vendors who listen closely, respect every role in the decision-making process, and communicate honestly stand out quickly. They’re the ones educators remember weeks later, when real conversations begin.
When the interaction feels human, the relationship has room to grow.
And in education, that’s where real progress starts.
Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.
