Are We Fixing Or Breaking Students?

If we could just fix our kids by plugging every hole from the past… they’d be just fine.

That’s the premise behind remediation, the whole scale re-teaching of missed skills. So, we attempt to reteach every skill they missed. We rework fractions and decimals again. Reteach parts of speech and punctuation and order of operations and multiplication tables again. These academically vulnerable students move backwards again and again as their peers move forward. And then we wring our hands about the number of students with gaps.

This remediation process typically begins with a pretest, a sound practice in many scenarios. Except that the students with the most gaps are now moved the farthest back in the skills maze. Will they ever reach the cheese? Probably not.

Plus, academically vulnerable students have likely been grouped together now so that not one learner in the entire class appears to be proficient in the subject. This certainly sets up challenges for differentiated instruction and student self-efficacy. How do we group a classroom full of students with similar deficiencies with stronger students when there are none available? Whatever shiny name we attach to this remedial class, every student in there knows they are now in the “dumb” class.

Remediation is a practice that may feel right; in fact, I used to go along with the crowd on it. Until I examined our data for students scheduled in a second math class that followed the “plug the gaps” model. A panic fell over me as I realized that, as a group, they had lost ground. How do you tell a student who’s been enrolled in two math classes that she is now in worse shape? How do you begin a parent conference with, “Apparently, we have somehow sucked information from your child’s head?”

Here are just some of the reasons that full-scale remediation is a problematic practice:

1.) Learning is often out of context and disconnected. Over here, the student is practicing fractions, but in the core class they might be learning about symmetry.

2.) Self-efficacy can plummet because forward progress is not evident – they are still not mastering today’s learning targets. Learners aren’t making significant progress in their core class.

3.) Remedial classes are more likely to be passive drill and kill sheets or clicking through endless screens. What learner was ever motivated by that instruction? Students who are behind need our most innovative, inspired instruction to gain traction.

4.) These same learners might have gaps in more than one content.

Are current practices to close gaps inadvertently leaving students behind? Quite possibly, yes. If the same names appear on lists requiring remediation, are we closing gaps? Quite possibly, no.

A Different Approach

Acceleration is a process in which we jumpstart academically vulnerable students on new content just in time for new learning. These learners are going to be moved a day or so ahead of the class. Remediation is present, but with a laser-like focus on just the skills required for the new content. Scaffolding devices, such as bookmarks and cheat sheets will be pushed in, so that students are armed for success. The best part is that learners explore the new content and upcoming vocabulary. This might include a video on crustaceans, a scavenger hunt exploring perimeter, or a sort on integers. When the core teacher announces, “Today, we’re going to talk about something called perimeter,” acceleration class students have just enough prior knowledge to spark hands in the air. “Hey, I know something about that!”

Why Acceleration Works

Acceleration gets under the hood of student failure. It strategically addresses three issues: gaps in prior knowledge, vocabulary, and skills. But it’s in the context of a fresh start for kids with an emphasis on supporting today’s learning. The essential role that prior knowledge plays in enhancing learning is firmly supported in a wealth of research.

Prior knowledge can:

• Improve reading comprehension
• Enhance student motivation, interest, effort, and attention
• Speed up learning
• Enhance retention of information

Conversely, evidence supports that the absence of prior knowledge can make learning something new frustratingly difficult. These missing pieces can create a misfire for students – the connections don’t get made. Acceleration provides just enough prior knowledge to latch on to new content.

What Acceleration Looks Like

Active, hands-on, scaffolded, engaging, and focused on learning targets – these are descriptors of an accelerated approach. And while some practice is warranted during acceleration, sessions are largely sans worksheets or computer screens.  From my own experiences and in working with districts to implement acceleration, here is the process that I share:

1.) Provide a sneak peak of the learning target they will see in class the next day.

2.) Generate intellectual curiosity & purpose in learning the concept. Examples: respond to pictures of earthquake damage, find all the decimals in a menu, measure circumference and diameter with string and compare.

3.) As new vocabulary is encountered, generate a TIP (Term-Info-Picture) chart. This sounds like, “Exponent – that’s a new word. Let’s write that on our TIP chart, explain what it is, and draw a picture.”

4.) Strategically insert scaffolding. NOW we talk about multiplying decimals and revisit skills they’ll need this week. Supportive devices constructed here can be used in the core class.

5.) Dip our toes in the new concept. In math, this might entail a few foundational problems. In language arts, this might be a video or sort on figurative language.

A Different Mindset

A few months ago, a principal from an urban school with a large number of economically disadvantaged students called me. Her words: “I’m tired of pouring money into remedial programs and not seeing results.” Her staff was ready to try an accelerated model. Just a couple of months into implementation, she couldn’t wait to share her benchmark gains. More important to her, however, were the changes observed in her students’ self-efficacy.  They were more engaged and working harder.

Another principal with similar positive results added this wonderful component: students being accelerated were morphing into classroom leaders. Any why not? They were walking into class armed with advance knowledge of new concepts, including critical academic vocabulary. An unexpected turn for her: a student who she deemed “caught up” wrote her a letter asking that he NOT be taken out of the acceleration class… when does that happen with remediation?

Rather than pounding away at a students’ not-so-great-academic past, acceleration can provide a fresh start for students. This approach is about what a learner can accomplish today on this lesson. Remediation is still being provided, but it’s in the context of what learners need right now. And yes, there may be some isolated skills they missed that won’t be revisited again and again and again. Guess what? They’ll survive. (They may not survive hating school.)

Acceleration might just be a match for your academically vulnerable learners.

Because “fixing” our kids by beating them down with every single thing they never got just might be what’s breaking them.

Author

                 

Further Reading

1. USA Today – Hidden dropouts: How schools make low achievers disappear
2. The Atlantic – Solving the Mystery of Underachievement
3. Berkeleyside – School Board overhauls Berkeley High’s ninth-grade program