edCircuit
  • Start Here
    • Login
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit a Press release
    • Advertise or Sponsor
    • Contribute
    • Get Interviewed
  • On the Wire
  • EdTech
    • All EdTech
    • Online Learning
    • Hybrid and Remote Learning
    • Augmented and Virtual Reality
    • ESports
    • Gamification and Game-Based Learning
    • Digital Citizenship
    • EdTech Entrepreneurs
    • Market Trends
    • Future of Education
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • K-12 Education
    • All K-12
    • K-12 Teachers
    • Teaching Strategies
    • Special Education and IEPs
    • Dyslexia
    • Gifted and Advanced Learning
    • Early Childhood, Pre-K and Kindergarten
    • School Calendar
    • Tutoring and Homework Help
    • Attendance and Absenteeism
    • After-School Programs
    • School Counselors
    • Homeschooling
    • School Models
    • Teacher Retention
    • Parents
    • Students
    • STEM and STEAM Education
  • Teaching and Learning
    • Literacy and Reading
    • Math Education
    • Civics and History Education
    • Financial Literacy
    • Assessment and Testing
    • Curriculum and Instruction
    • Personalized Learning
    • Project-Based Learning
    • Social-Emotional Learning
    • Executive Function
    • Creativity
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
  • Professional Development
    • All Professional Development
    • Educators
    • Administrators
    • edLeaders
  • Higher Education
    • All Higher Education
    • College Admissions
    • Career and Technical Education (CTE)
    • Graduation
    • FAFSA and Financial Aid
    • Student Loans
  • Cybersecurity
  • School Safety
    • All School Safety
    • Science and Lab Safety
    • School Design and Facilities
    • Bullying
    • Duty of Care and School Liability
  • Continuing Education
    • All Continuing Education
    • Online Certificate Programs
    • Teaching Jobs and Careers
    • Teacher Appreciation
  • Education Policy and Government
    • All Education Policy
    • Department of Education
    • School Choice
    • Global
    • Advocates
  • EDU Shows
    • All EDU Shows
    • Safer Ed
    • Mind the Gap
    • Education Industry Questions
    • CoffeEd
    • InFocus
    • InformED Report
  • EDU Podcasts
    • All EDU Podcasts
    • Author Chats
    • CoSN The Podcast
    • Education Today
    • Building the Bridge
    • Students Speak
  • Education Industry Guides and Reports
  • Archived Media
    • Future of School: The Podcast
    • Equity Everywhere
  • About edCircuit
  • Subscribe
edCircuit
  • Sign in
Join Free
Home Tags Posts tagged with "special education"
Tag:

special education

Follow
College student on a phone with social media icons floating toward a campus building
EdTechInformED ReportK-12

Future of EdTech Devices – Using Social Media

by EdCircuit Staff January 24, 2017
written by EdCircuit Staff 5 minutes read

Play video: The InformED Report: Episode 20 (1 minute 30 seconds)1:30

The InformED Report: Episode 201 min 30 sedCircuit on Vimeo

The InformED Report for January 24, 2017 set two views of social media side by side: a case for colleges using it to listen to students, and a British study linking social media use with lower life satisfaction among children. It then looked at what schools need in place before adopting wearable devices and virtual reality. The spotlight went to a Maryland mother who found that no one could say how much her county spent on early help for struggling students.

In this edition

  • Eric Stoller argued in Inside Higher Ed that colleges can use social media to hear from students in real time, rather than waiting for year-end surveys.
  • A study of British children aged 10 to 15 linked one hour a day of chatting on social networks with lower life satisfaction.
  • EdTech Magazine set out three things schools need before adopting wearables: enough bandwidth, safe handling of student data and thorough planning and training.
  • Katherine Spurlock found that Maryland districts kept no data on spending for early academic and behavioral interventions, and legislators moved to require it.

Social media as a way to listen to students

In his Inside Higher Ed blog, Eric Stoller took his cue from Twitter’s CEO, Jack Dorsey, who at the end of 2016 asked users on Twitter what they wanted the platform to improve. Stoller’s argument was that colleges could do the same. By asking students well-designed questions on social media, institutions gain real-time responses and ideas that may never surface in formal surveys. “Why wait until an end-of-year survey,” he asked, when students can be polled throughout the year?

He was candid about the drawbacks. Some responses will be exaggerated, and Twitter itself had serious problems with hate speech and trolling. But he argued that useful threads usually run through even the noisiest replies, and that the same channels can later support community building, student services and conversations with students about their digital identity.

One hour a day, and children’s wellbeing

The other side of the screen-time question came from NBC News, where Nicole Spector reported on “Social Media Use and Children’s Wellbeing,” a paper published by the IZA Institute of Labor Economics. Drawing on surveys of British households from 2010 to 2014, the authors found that children aged 10 to 15 who spent one hour a day chatting on social networks were less content overall. In their words, that hour reduced the probability of being completely satisfied with life by approximately 14 percentage points.

The study is worth reading carefully. It describes British families, and it measures an association with reported life satisfaction rather than proving that social media causes unhappiness. The authors pointed to cyberbullying, more social comparison and less face-to-face time as possible explanations. For schools encouraging more screen-based learning, it was a reason to think about how and why students are online, and to teach the risks as well as the benefits, as a therapist quoted in Spector’s piece recommended.

Getting schools ready for connected devices

In EdTech Magazine, Erin Brereton noted that the New Media Consortium expected wearable technology to reach widespread use in K-12 within four to five years. Washington Leadership Academy, a technology-focused charter school in Washington, D.C., planned to use virtual reality headsets in chemistry class. Brereton set out three things schools should do first.

The first was bandwidth. A 2016 Funds for Learning report found that 44 percent of E-Rate applicants surveyed said their Wi-Fi network was more than three years old. The second was data. Wearables collect and share information about students, so schools need to know how it will be transmitted and stored. Westonka Public Schools in suburban Minneapolis, which gave students heart rate monitors for physical education, questioned vendors on data security and limited access to the app to Femrite and the district’s physical education teachers. The third was planning and training. Westonka piloted the program with 85 fourth graders and 90 seventh graders, and staff attended a daylong webinar run by the manufacturer before launch. “You cannot throw technology at people and expect it all to work perfectly,” said Mark Femrite, the district’s assistant superintendent of teaching and learning.

InformED Report spotlight: a mother follows the money on early intervention

Katherine Spurlock, a former public school teacher, moved to Montgomery County, Maryland, and set out to make sure her daughter, who has dyslexia, received the right interventions in school, Valerie Strauss reported in The Washington Post. Along the way she discovered that the county had no data showing how much it spent on early academic or behavioral interventions for students who need them, and neither did any other county in Maryland.

That gap matters because research shows that intervention from kindergarten through third grade can ease learning disabilities and improve outcomes. Maryland’s own special education data showed many students referred only after those early grades, when achievement gaps had already opened. Spurlock worked with legislators, and state Sen. Joan Carter Conway and Del. Marc Korman introduced bills to require school boards to report data on specialized intervention services each year. For district leaders, the question her work raised was a simple one to ask of their own budgets: how much is spent on early intervention, at what ages, and is it helping?

Further reading from that week

  • Education Dive: Department of Education offers schools new ed tech evaluation tool
  • Education World: How Will a Trump Admin Impact Tech in Schools? Office of Ed Tech Defines Goals
  • EdTech Magazine: K-12 Schools Embrace Anytime, Anywhere Learning

Sources

  • Eric Stoller, “Using Social Media to Listen and Learn from Students,” Inside Higher Ed, January 5, 2017.
  • Nicole Spector, “Just One Hour a Day on Social Media Makes Teens Miserable,” NBC News, December 29, 2016.
  • Erin Brereton, “3 Tips to Prepare Schools for Connected Devices,” EdTech Magazine, January 4, 2017.
  • Valerie Strauss, “How one mother discovered a problem with special education and got legislators to help try to fix it,” The Washington Post, January 8, 2017.

About the InformED Report

The InformED Report is edCircuit’s short news program on education. This edition first ran on January 24, 2017. In 2026, edCircuit re-presented it with a new anchor and this full written account. Both report the stories as they stood on that date and link the original reporting, so readers can see exactly where each claim came from.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.

January 24, 2017 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinWhatsappCopy LinkEmail
Low-angle view of the American flag waving against a bright blue sky on a sunny day
School ChoiceDepartment of EducationK-12InformED Report

Are Public Schools Under Attack?

by EdCircuit Staff January 17, 2017
written by EdCircuit Staff 6 minutes read

Play video: The InformED Report: Episode 16 (1 minute 55 seconds)1:55

The InformED Report: Episode 161 min 55 sedCircuit on Vimeo

In January 2017, Betsy DeVos was waiting for the Senate to take up her nomination as U.S. Secretary of Education. The InformED Report for January 17, 2017 gathered the main voices in the argument over what she would mean for public schools, from school choice groups to Detroit educators who saw her record as a warning. It then turned to two stories about students with disabilities, one in Virginia and one in Connecticut, and to a fight in New York City over space for charter schools.

In this edition

  • President-elect Donald Trump’s choice of Betsy DeVos, a leading voucher and charter advocate, drew praise from school choice groups and alarm from public school supporters.
  • Virginia students with disabilities helped publish a guide that gives schools activities for building disability awareness and inclusion.
  • Parents in Greenwich, Connecticut, objected to proposed special education cuts in a year of reduced state aid.
  • A charter school group ran TV ads accusing New York Mayor Bill de Blasio of keeping 40,000 children on charter waiting lists.

Betsy DeVos and the fight over public school dollars

Donald Trump named DeVos as his choice for education secretary in late November 2016. She was a Michigan philanthropist and Republican donor who chaired the American Federation for Children, a group that promotes school vouchers and scholarship tax credit programs. In eSchool News, Laura Ascione Devaney reported that she had no professional experience working in schools, and that Trump had proposed a $20 million fund to support school choice through charters and vouchers.

The New York Times summed up the concern in a line that MSNBC’s Steve Benen quoted: “It is hard to find anyone more passionate about the idea of steering public dollars away from traditional public schools than Betsy DeVos.” Benen read the nomination as a sign that a major fight over school privatization was coming.

CNN’s Sara Ganim and Linh Tran reported that DeVos and her husband had spent millions over the years lobbying for changes to Michigan schools, and that Detroit educators from both parties said her push for school choice and loosely regulated charters had not worked for the city’s children. Tonya Allen, president and CEO of the Skillman Foundation and a member of a coalition working to fix Detroit schools, put it plainly: “When I hear her name and I think about education, I think about choice without quality.”

Supporters argued that vouchers free students from the limits of where they live or what their families can afford; opponents said they move public money to private schools that are not always accountable. For district leaders, the practical question was how far a federal secretary could shift that balance, since most decisions about charters and vouchers sit with states.

Virginia students write a guide to inclusion

Students in the Virginia Board for People with Disabilities’ Youth Leadership Forum and the Virginia Department of Education’s I’m Determined project published “A Guide to Planning an Inclusion Project,” NBC 29 reported. The guide offers sample activities for elementary, middle and high schools that want to build disability awareness and inclusion.

In one elementary exercise, students use tablets, an app and resources from the American Dyslexia Association to see what learning mathematics is like for a classmate with dyscalculia. In a middle school activity, a team builds an obstacle course that shows the daily challenges faced by students who use wheelchairs, walkers and other mobility devices.

Greenwich parents push back on special education cuts

In Greenwich, Connecticut, Superintendent Sal Corda proposed several cuts to special education as part of the district’s 2017-18 operating budget, Emilie Munson reported in Greenwich Time. They included less money for private school placements and for tuition settlements with dissatisfied parents. Corda said the cuts would not affect the services students are entitled to by law.

Parents were not reassured. The proposals came after a $41.6 million cut to the state’s Education Cost Sharing grant earlier in 2016, which had already reduced state support for special education. Parents said their children would not get the support they needed. They also pointed to a tension many districts know well: the central office staff who help decide what a student’s individual education plan requires also build the budget that pays for it.

Charter school space and the New York City mayor

In New York City, the group Families for Excellent Schools began a television ad campaign accusing Mayor Bill de Blasio of keeping 40,000 children on charter school waiting lists while the city had more than 200 half-empty school buildings, the New York Daily News’s Jennifer Fermino reported. A Department of Education spokeswoman, Devora Kaye, called the ad “simply inaccurate” and said the city worked closely with charter schools on the use of school space.

More than 100,000 New York City students attended charter schools, yet most local charter leaders stayed quiet about her, Monica Disare reported in The Atlantic. Her emphasis on private school vouchers and lighter charter oversight looked very different from New York’s more tightly regulated sector, and Steve Wilson, CEO of the Ascend charter network, said many charter founders were “deeply troubled by the idea of vouchers.” It was a reminder that “school choice” covers several very different policies.

Further reading from that week

  • The American Prospect: The War on Public Schools
  • PBS NewsHour: Why so many students from for-profit schools are left in debt limbo
  • CNN Politics: Obama looks to lock in $1 billion to schools with low-income kids

Sources

  • Steve Benen, “With cabinet choice, Trump readies fight with public schools,” MSNBC, November 28, 2016.
  • Laura Ascione Devaney, “Here’s what you need to know about Betsy DeVos, likely Education Secretary,” eSchool News, November 28, 2016.
  • Sara Ganim and Linh Tran, “Trump’s choice for education secretary raises questions,” CNN Politics, December 2, 2016.
  • “Students with Disabilities Develop Guide for Schools to Promote Awareness,” NBC 29, December 2016.
  • Emilie Munson, “Greenwich special ed parents blast proposed cuts,” Greenwich Time, December 2016.
  • Jennifer Fermino, “Charter school group launches ad war against Mayor de Blasio,” New York Daily News, November 29, 2016.
  • Monica Disare, “The Notable Silence of New York’s Charter-School Leaders,” The Atlantic, December 1, 2016.

About the InformED Report

The InformED Report is edCircuit’s short news program on education. This edition first ran on January 17, 2017. In 2026, edCircuit re-presented it with a new anchor and this full written account. Both report the stories as they stood on that date and link the original reporting, so readers can see exactly where each claim came from.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.

January 17, 2017 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinWhatsappCopy LinkEmail
Students walking into a German university, tuition-free college
InformED Report

InformED Report 11/3/16

by EdCircuit Staff November 3, 2016
written by EdCircuit Staff 6 minutes read

Play video: The InformED Report: Episode 5 (3 minutes 17 seconds)3:17

The InformED Report: Episode 53 min 17 sedCircuit on Vimeo

In the final days of the 2016 campaign, Hillary Clinton’s promise of tuition-free public college for most families was one of the few education proposals voters heard repeatedly. The InformED Report for November 3, 2016 looked at what Germany’s experience suggested about free tuition and how Clinton planned to pay for hers. It then reported on families in Texas, Flint and New York who said children with disabilities were being denied the services federal law guarantees, and on new Google and Gallup research showing who gets to study computer science in school.

In this edition

  • Germany’s tuition-free universities showed both the appeal and the strains of free college, a model Clinton proposed for the U.S.
  • Clinton’s plan would make public college tuition free for households earning up to $125,000, at a cost of $450 billion.
  • Texas had the lowest special education enrollment in the nation, and Flint families announced a proposed class action over special education services.
  • A New York for-profit preschool company agreed to pay more than $4.3 million for misusing special education funds.
  • Black students were 1.5 times as interested in computer science as their white peers but less likely to have classes in it.

Free college: the German example and the Clinton plan

Jon Marcus, writing in Quartz, went to Berlin’s Freie Universität to see how tuition-free higher education looked from the inside. Two students, Claudia Niessler and Stefan Steinbock, said they would not have attended a university that charged tuition, and that free tuition let students with good grades and low incomes earn degrees. The university’s president, Peter-André Alt, saw the other side: without tuition revenue, universities were overcrowded and stretched thin, and taxpayers who never attended college were paying to fill the gap. The article’s headline drew the lesson for the U.S.: tuition-free college was no silver bullet for America’s education problems.

In the Washington Post, Danielle Douglas-Gabriel examined how Clinton would pay for her version. During the final debate, Clinton said tuition at public colleges and universities would be free for students from households earning up to $125,000, as part of a $450 billion higher education plan. Her campaign had first proposed a $350 billion plan, the New College Compact, which would give money to states that guarantee “no-loan” tuition at four-year public universities and community colleges. To pay for it, the campaign said Clinton would bring back Reagan-era cuts to itemized tax deductions for high-income families.

A Michigan story in Inside Higher Ed showed how improvised college funding can become permanent. During the recession of the late 2000s, the state began directing federal welfare money to state college tuition grants. Andrew Kreighbaum reported that more than $93 million of Michigan’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Families allocation went to tuition grants, with more than $40 million going to private institutions in fiscal 2016. Taken together, the three pieces moved the free-college debate toward the questions of who would pay, and what universities would give up to make it work.

Children with disabilities and the services they were owed

Texas had the lowest special education enrollment in the nation. KERA News’s Bill Zeeble reported that, a month after the Houston Chronicle found the state had for 12 years delayed or withheld services to save money, federal authorities were asking Texas to justify its policies. Rosly Espinoza described years of trying to get help for her daughter Citlali, whose struggles began in pre-kindergarten and worsened by second grade. Espinoza asked the school to evaluate her daughter, the step required before services can begin, and the school did not.

In Flint, Michigan, ThinkProgress’s Bryce Covert reported that the water crisis had compounded learning challenges for children who already had them. Nakiya Wakes said her son, who has ADHD, was suspended more than 50 times in a year, and that the school fought her request for an Individualized Education Program. “We didn’t ask to be poisoned, and these kids need their education,” she said. Flint families, with the ACLU of Michigan, the law firm White & Case and the Education Law Center, announced a proposed class action alleging that the state and the Flint school system were already failing children with special needs before the crisis.

In New York, The New York Times’s Kate Taylor reported that the for-profit company K3 Learning Inc. and the family behind it had agreed to pay the state more than $4.3 million. State Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman’s office said money meant for special education preschool had gone to credit card bills, a boat and a son’s law school tuition.

The three cases were different in cause, but each turned on the same duty. A district must evaluate a child it has reason to suspect has a disability, and money set aside for those children has to reach them. For special education directors, the stories were a reason to check how quickly evaluation requests were answered and how closely contracted services were audited.

The gaps in computer science education

New research from Google and Gallup, reported by Jessica Guynn in USA Today, found that Black students were less likely to have computer science classes at school and less likely to use computers at home, even though they were 1.5 times as interested in studying the subject as their white peers. In The Atlantic, Emily DeRuy reported that just over half of students in grades 7 through 12 attended a school offering a dedicated computer science class, and that teachers and parents were more likely to tell boys than girls they would be good at it.

A coalition of computer scientists had just released a framework describing what K-12 students should know about computer science, and organizations from the National Science Foundation and the College Board to Code.org and Girls Who Code were working to expand access. For school leaders, the survey suggested that student interest was already there. Offering the course, and making sure counselors and teachers encouraged every student to take it, was where schools could act.

Sources

  • Jon Marcus, “Germany proves tuition-free college is not a silver bullet for America’s education woes,” Quartz, October 2016.
  • Danielle Douglas-Gabriel, “Clinton touts debt-free college plan. Here’s how she’d pay for it,” The Washington Post, October 19, 2016.
  • Andrew Kreighbaum, “Welfare Funds for Students Far From Welfare,” Inside Higher Ed, October 18, 2016.
  • Bill Zeeble, “In Texas, Families With Special Education Needs Feel Their Kids Are Getting Shortchanged,” KERA News, October 2016.
  • Bryce Covert, “Families in Flint say there’s a special education crisis that’s about to get worse,” ThinkProgress, October 2016.
  • Kate Taylor, “Education Company to Pay $4.3 Million in Settlement With New York State,” The New York Times, October 19, 2016.
  • Jessica Guynn, “Google: Race, gender gaps persist in computer science education,” USA Today, October 18, 2016.
  • Emily DeRuy, “A Plan to Teach Every Child Computer Science,” The Atlantic, October 2016.

About the InformED Report

The InformED Report is edCircuit’s short news program on education. This edition first ran on November 3, 2016. In 2026, edCircuit re-presented it with a new anchor and this full written account. Both report the stories as they stood on that date and link the original reporting, so readers can see exactly where each claim came from.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.

November 3, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinWhatsappCopy LinkEmail
A retro typewriter featuring a 'NEWS' headline typed on white paper against a wooden surface
InformED Report

InformED Report 10/27/16

by EdCircuit Staff October 27, 2016
written by EdCircuit Staff 6 minutes read

Play video: The InformED Report: Episode 2 (2 minutes 19 seconds)2:19

The InformED Report: Episode 22 min 19 sedCircuit on Vimeo

In September 2016, a Houston Chronicle investigation reported that Texas had for years held the share of students receiving special education to a target far below the national rate. The InformED Report for October 27, 2016 led with that story and the reaction to it. It then looked at how little education featured in the first presidential debate, and at new federal figures on student loan defaults at for-profit colleges, alongside Senator Elizabeth Warren’s criticism of how the Education Department was treating former Corinthian Colleges students.

In this edition

  • The Houston Chronicle reported that Texas officials had set an 8.5 percent benchmark for special education enrollment, far below the national average of about 13 percent.
  • Education received only fleeting mentions in the first presidential debate and remained a second-tier issue in the campaign.
  • Students at for-profit colleges accounted for 35 percent of federal student loan defaults while making up 26 percent of borrowers.
  • Senator Warren said nearly 80,000 former Corinthian students were being pushed into debt collection.

How Texas kept children out of special education

Brian M. Rosenthal’s investigation for the Houston Chronicle found that, starting in 2004, unelected officials at the Texas Education Agency set a benchmark of 8.5 percent for the share of students who should receive special education services, and then audited districts that served more. The policy was never publicly announced or explained. Districts above the line were asked to file “corrective action” plans for lowering their special education populations. The paper reported that Texas reached 8.5 percent for the first time in 2015, down from about 12 percent a dozen years earlier, while the national average stood near 13 percent.

The Chronicle told the story through families such as Heidi Walker, who had told administrators at her son’s school in Humble that her 5-year-old had been diagnosed with a disability similar to autism, months before a kindergarten meltdown at recess showed how much help he needed. Federal law has required public schools to serve every eligible child with a disability since 1975. By the paper’s estimate, if Texas served students at the national rate, 250,000 more children would be receiving services such as therapy, counseling and one-on-one tutoring. Writing in The Washington Post, Valerie Strauss summarized the finding that the effort had saved the state billions of dollars while denying support to children with autism, dyslexia, epilepsy, mental illness, speech impairments, and even blindness and deafness.

The state disputed the account. The Texas Education Agency said 8.5 percent was an “indicator,” not a mandated goal, and that it did not punish districts that exceeded it. Even so, Education Commissioner Mike Morath said the agency would review its special education program, and House Speaker Joe Straus said he would work with the agency on the problem. According to the Chronicle, no other state had limited special education in this way.

For special education directors anywhere, the story raised a hard question about what drives identification. A district’s obligation to evaluate a child it suspects has a disability comes from federal law, not from a state target or a budget line, and an enrollment figure that looks low can hide children who were never assessed.

Education’s small place in the presidential debate

Politico’s Michael Stratford counted only fleeting mentions of education in the first debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Clinton raised it most often. She twice mentioned “debt-free college” as part of her economic plan, pledged to invest in education for middle-class workers, and promised to help people refinance college debt at a lower rate. She also suggested that if Trump paid no federal income tax, he contributed “zero for schools.” Trump said the country needed new schools, along with hospitals and airports, but that “we don’t have the money because it’s been squandered on so many of [Clinton’s] ideas.”

Business Insider’s Abby Jackson described education as a second-tier issue in the 2016 election, with both nominees spending most of their time on national security, trade and an email scandal. In Trump’s case, education still followed him through the lawsuits brought by former students of Trump University. For school leaders trying to read the campaign, the debates gave few specifics. The candidates’ written plans, rather than their stage remarks, were the better guide to what either administration might do.

For-profit colleges and student loan defaults

New Education Department data, reported by Lucinda Shen in Fortune, showed that students at for-profit colleges accounted for 35 percent of federal student loan defaults in the three-year period beginning in 2013, down from 44 percent two years earlier. Those students made up just 26 percent of all borrowers. The measure counted borrowers who had missed payments for 360 consecutive days. The release came as the department was tightening its oversight of for-profit chains such as ITT Technical Institute, DeVry, Corinthian Colleges and Brown Mackie College.

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts drew attention to what happened to students after a college failed. Common Dreams reported that, in a letter to Secretary John King, she said the department’s student loan bank was pushing nearly 80,000 former Corinthian students into some form of debt collection, despite assurances that they would be eligible for loan discharges. “It is unconscionable that instead of helping these borrowers, vast numbers of Corinthian victims are currently being hounded,” she wrote. CNN Money, meanwhile, offered prospective students a list of questions to ask before enrolling at any for-profit college.

For high school counselors, the default figures were a practical warning. Helping a student compare a program’s cost, completion record and job placement before signing a loan is part of preparing them for what comes after graduation.

Sources

  • Brian M. Rosenthal, “How Texas keeps tens of thousands of children out of special education,” Houston Chronicle, September 2016.
  • Valerie Strauss, “What Texas did to its special education students,” The Washington Post, September 18, 2016.
  • Michael Stratford, “Fleeting mentions of education in first debate,” Politico, September 27, 2016.
  • Abby Jackson, “Here’s where Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump stand on education,” Business Insider, September 2016.
  • Lucinda Shen, “For-Profit Colleges Account for a Third of All Federal Student Loan Defaults,” Fortune, September 29, 2016.
  • Lauren McCauley, “Warren Blasts Dept of Ed. for ‘Hounding’ Students Defrauded by For-Profit School,” Common Dreams, September 30, 2016.
  • Katie Lobosco, “For-profit colleges: 6 things to ask before enrolling,” CNN Money, September 2016.

About the InformED Report

The InformED Report is edCircuit’s short news program on education. This edition first ran on October 27, 2016. In 2026, edCircuit re-presented it with a new anchor and this full written account. Both report the stories as they stood on that date and link the original reporting, so readers can see exactly where each claim came from.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.

October 27, 2016 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinWhatsappCopy LinkEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Participate

  • Contribute
  • Sponsor
  • Submit Release
  • Subscribe
  • Get Interviewed
Logo with an orange lowercase letter e followed by the partially visible, faded text edCircuit on a light background.

edCircuit emPowers the voices of education, with hundreds of  trusted contributors, change-makers and industry-leading innovators.

Washington, DC

Share your voice

  • Contribute
  • Sponsor
  • Submit Release
  • Subscribe
  • Get Interviewed

Follow edCircuit

  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest

Learn more

  • Our Reach
  • edCircuit Media
  • Careers

YouTube channel

  • YouTube

@edcircuit

Copyright © 2014-2026, edCircuit Media – emPowering the Voices of Education.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.

Customize
  • Needed for the site to work: signing in, the cart, your consent choice. Always on.

    8 cookies
    • ss_consent 1 yearYour cookie choice on this site, so you are not asked again.
    • wordpress_logged_in_* 2 days, or 14 days with "remember me"Keeps you signed in as you move between pages.
    • wordpress_sec_* 2 days, or 14 days with "remember me"The secure half of your sign-in.
    • wordpress_test_cookie SessionChecks that your browser accepts cookies when you sign in.
    • wp-settings-* 1 yearYour display settings when signed in.
    • wp_woocommerce_session_* 2 daysYour shopping session: the cart and the checkout.
    • woocommerce_cart_hash SessionTells the site whether your cart has changed.
    • woocommerce_items_in_cart SessionWhether your cart holds anything.
  • Remembers choices you make, such as a language or a region, and supports features like live chat.

    1 cookie
    • woocommerce_recently_viewed SessionThe products you looked at, so the site can show them again.
  • Helps us understand how visitors use the site: which pages are read, and for how long.

    2 cookies
    • _ga 2 yearsGoogle Analytics: tells one visitor from another. Set only after you allow analytics.
    • _ga_* 2 yearsGoogle Analytics: keeps your session state. Set only after you allow analytics.
  • Measures how fast pages load so we can make them faster.

  • Used to show you content and offers that match your interests, on this site and elsewhere.

    1 cookie
    • sbjs_* SessionWooCommerce order attribution: where you came from, so a purchase can be credited to the campaign or site that sent you.

Your browser asks us not to sell or share your information (Global Privacy Control), so advertising cookies stay off.

Do not sell or share my personal information

Some cookies from other companies help show you offers on other sites. Tick the box and save your preference to opt out of that sharing; untick it to opt back in at any time.

Your browser sends Global Privacy Control, so this preference is set for you and cannot be changed here.

Sign In

Keep me signed in until I sign out

Forgot your password?

Password Recovery

A new password will be emailed to you.

Have received a new password? Login here

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close
-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00

Your cart (items: 0)

Products in cart

Product Details Total
Subtotal $0.00
Shipping and discounts calculated at checkout.
View cart
Go to checkout

Your shopping cart is empty

Return to shop

Notifications