Properly Built Teams And Their Value In Education
By Franklin P. Schargel
Team building is an essential component in industry and in education. Teams offer a systematic structure to address prevent and solve many of the problems we face in education today that are too difficult for one person or one group to solve. In addition, effective teams:
- Allow for increased faculty, parent and student participation
- Encourage “ownership” of processes
- Open lines of communication
- Provide for commitment to a common purpose and performance goals
- Share responsibility
- Permit diversity of ideas and opinions to be expressed in an open, non-judgemental forum
- Provide opportunities to participate in decision-making
- Promote the exchange of feedback
There are four stages of team development:
Stage 1: Forming: In this stage members of the team get to know one another.
Stage 2: Storming: In this stage team members clarify the purpose of the group and its procedures.
Stage 3: Norming: Here, members practice and experiment in finding solutions.
Stage 4: High Performing: The team is now capable of producing positive, long-lasting results.
At each stage, members of the team need to determine:
- At which stage the team is in?
- How do you get it to move to the next higher level?
According to Dr. Mary Ann Smialek in her book, “Team Strategies for Success” published by Roman Education:
“It is critical to understand a basic concept of teamwork, that everyone has a vital role in the organization. This concept allows that team members “figure out” what their goals should be and what kinds of problems they should be looking for, where to look for them, and what solutions are important. Consider the fact that the people at the level where the work gets done know best where the problems lie. Professional and support staff, parents and sometimes students working in teams are the essential ingredient in understanding what is happening at the places where the work gets done. Therefore, everyone in the system is involved in studying it and proposing how to improve it. Learning is part of work, driven by each person’s need to be effective. Problem solving and shared decision-making processes must address the same problem: how better to meet the learning needs of students.”
Components of effective teams:
Leadership
Teams need a leader with a vision that shares leadership with teams, and provides a proven strategy that can be applied in an education environment seeking to improve work and learning processes.
Shared Vision
Another key component of teams is that they have a shared vision of their task. Lack of shared clarity about direction gets teams stuck! When was the last time you were on a team where the participants held different notions about their task? When there’s no strong agreement about the task at hand, it’s easy for people to bicker about whether each should be doing what they’re doing.
Shared clarity is a prerequisite for high performance.
A Clearly Defined Vision
The easiest way for this to happen is for the team to develop a mission statement. It should read something like this: “We exist to … (core purpose). We are responsible for …( deliverables). At all times, we will follow… (ground rules.).”
Team Responsibilities
The responsibility for the success of a team does not lie solely with the team leader but with the entire team. Team members should identify a set of rules of behaviors. The following are offered as suggestions:
All team members should:
- Help the team stick to the agenda
- Help assign tasks
- Be involved in brainstorming
- Synthesize material
- Keep track of time
- Help other members reach consensus
- Regularly review progress
- Volunteer for assignments
- Ask questions
- Summarize
- Offer feedback
- Keep team focused on topic
- Bring up new business
- Come to meetings prepared
- Compliment the team & individual members
- Encourage each person to speak
- Ensure members treat one another respectfully
- Use humor
- Suggest a break if necessary
- Ask if everyone agrees
- Ensure there is a common understanding before moving on
- Reduce defensive behavior
- Watch body language to spot possible problems
- Develop pride in team success
- Encourage the team
The National School Boards’ Association has developed guidelines for effective Team Members:
Contribute ideas and solutions. Team members need to draw on their own expertise and experience and contribute ideas and solutions. Creative input from a variety of member perspectives is the basis of effective problem solving.
- Recognize and respect difference in others. Creative, effective teams bring together individuals with widely divergent skills and background who must work closely together to execute the tasks assigned to them. This can only be accomplished in an atmosphere of mutual respect and willingness to listen. Team members will not always agree with the ideas of other team members, but should always be willing to listen without prejudice.
- Value the ideas and contributions of others. Input from every member of the team should be carefully weighed and evaluated, never disparaged.
- Listen and share information. Really listening to what other team members have to say is one of the most vital skills you can contribute to a productive team atmosphere.
- Ask questions and get clarification. If an idea is not clear to you, it is your responsibility to ask questions until the matter is clarified. Limit jargon.
- Participate fully and keep your commitments. In order to fully participate, you have to contribute ideas, and challenge the conventional ways of doing things.
What Are The Characteristics Of Effective Team Members?
Team members are supportive to achieve results- Team members avoid “winning” at the expense of others
- Team members keep the goal and the mission in mind
- Team members are open to the ideas of others
- Team members share information and ideas
- Team members support the contribution of others
Without the enthusiastic support of all members, a team is just a collection of individuals. The unique skills and perspectives that each team member brings to the team are crucial to the success of the completion of the tasks. With those objectives in mind, schools can move forward, collectively.
Author
Mr. Franklin P. Schargel is an author, consultant and Senior Managing Associate of the School Success Network, an educational consulting organization interested in Improving School Performance and Increasing School Graduates. He is also the author of 12 books on school reform. Visit his website, www.schargel.com for additional material on school reform. He can be reached at franklin@schargel.com, and you can follow him on Twitter
- WSYM TV – Local third-graders test MSU students’ Design Day project
- Yahoo Finance – Tata Consultancy and Toronto School Board Host 18 Schools in ‘goIT’ App Finale
- Philly.com – Eagles’ Hicks and Sixers’ Covington to ‘draft’ kids for book-writing contest

When a state creates opportunities for districts to personalize learning for their students, through pilot programs, innovation zones or through other allowances through their state education agency, they send a message to districts that they are committed to growing and sustaining this work over time. They are making a commitment to innovative learning. Such is the case in North Dakota.
Project based learning, the rising star in the educational firmament, is on the lips of nearly every teacher and district in the U.S. and in many countries abroad. A newly recruited army of PBL experts march to the front of professional development workshops, evangelizing for project-based work and selling the notion that this is what 21st Century education looks like.
PBL will bloom when PBL teachers define intelligence as psychologists do today: As behaviors that matter in today’s world. Which behaviors matter most?
500 years ago, theologians stood at the lectern and shared ‘nearer to God’ content with neophytes. That stereotype clings to the teaching profession, which still focuses on instructional delivery, classroom management, and pacing guides because that’s what teachers do. There is still room for this approach, but we refuse to see what teaching has become: A facilitative profession in which the skills of mentorship, diagnosis, designing, and assessing the deeper aspects of human performance are critical. This is especially true of PBL, which relies on a culture of care and a sincere bond between teacher and student to fuel and support the personalized process of self-motivation and curious investigation that ignites and excites a student.
Thinking of PBL as a designed learning experience allows us to connect design thinking, maker spaces, inquiry-based learning, personalized learning, and other forward-leaning ideas into the grand unified theory that will serve as the template for 21st Century education. The tenets of PBL — a challenging problem, collaborative inquiry, a design and draft and revise process, and a public sharing of learning — provide a fine structure for any investigative process, whether a project on Shakespeare or an engineering problem. PBL can move forward by becoming a flexible design process applied and personalized for audience and subject, whether a case-based PBL focused on helping students become workforce ready, a science-focused PBL that prepares students for the deep analysis on Advanced Placement exams or a global studies PBL centered on research and solutions to pressing issues.
Founder of



Teachers rejoiced at the variety of fun and engaging free digital tools that they could use with their students, the wonderful interaction the tools brought and the great impact on classroom instruction that they had. They were able to see student responses and intervene promptly to correct misconceptions, to give students homework and track the progress through the tasks, they were even able to tag their test questions to learning standards to determine what understanding of the concept that the student had. Schools and district administrators rejoiced at the teacher enthusiasm and student excitement with the digital transition and looked forward to seeing improved learning outcomes.
We can call this the K-12 Big Data Dilemma. As we well know, the
In Houston ISD (HISD), we started the digital transition four years ago, and it included 1-1 programs, the implementation of an LMS, a digital content and curriculum initiative that made all high school books available exclusively online, and the circle was completed with a transition from paper and pencil to eAssessments (online testing) on the state and formative assessment platforms. The HISD eAssessment program complements the integration of digital curriculum, which advances the instructional goals of personalized learning, data ownership and improved mastery; this is facilitated by a formative assessment platform, OnTrack, powered by School City, that satisfies our authoring and reporting needs, aside from being nimble with online assessments as it is with paper. All systems and digital tools purchased by HISD are conformant with IMS Global interoperability standards, and facilitate a cohesive data flow.
Because so much of the student academic data comes from teacher-student interaction in class, and this information is “live,” it is important to learn how to capture it in a meaningful format, which enables for it to be aggregated. It was therefore important to train teachers on how to build digital assessments that are reliable and standards- aligned. In HISD the schools are becoming accustomed to teaching and learning on mobile devices, and online formative assessments are increasing at a vertiginous rate. To support the digital transformation, and prepare for next gen assessment, Digital Assessment Literacy is focused both on the utilization of assessments and data, and on the assessment authoring aspect. Data relevance, heat maps, and Data Driven Instruction (DDI) are elements that campus and district staff are continuously training on and putting in practice when creating assessments, as well as when making data driven learning decisions. To support ease of test authoring for teachers we purchased the new formative assessment platform, School City. School City enables the test authors at all levels to align the test items to learning standards, and embed accessibility features, which mimic the Texas state standardized assessment accessibility features to support all student learning needs. It also provides a reporting feature that is easy to read and helps teachers support students’ learning with personalized learning resources. Maybe the most important and valued feature is the student facing data, which is released at the end of the test where students see what questions they missed and how they are connected to their learning, before they even see the grade.
Diana Bidulescu, M.Ed. is the Online Assessment Manager for
“If you don’t read the newspaper you are uninformed,
To help everyone out, I interviewed one of the true experts in the field, Frank Baker who at
We tend to think of all this as the realm of three areas in our schools: English, Social Studies and the School Library. Nope, it’s everywhere. As mentioned, music, cinema and art propagandize and can create a false impression. We can teach it there. In science, have you ever heard of “Predatory Journals,” unchecked research with fake editors publishing for a fee to enhance the careers of young unpublished scientists looking for credit? From ArsTechnica.com in March 2017, “By 2014, nearly half a million articles had been published in journals like these and the public can’t tell the difference between legitimate scientific publications and the junk published in Predatory journals.”
The media is everywhere in our lives. And although fake news has always been around, the proliferation of news and other media assets makes it even more important now to teach our children the healthy skepticism and skills of discernment they will need to separate the wheat from the chaff. Our job as educators is to help drive the acquisition of knowledge and connect that knowledge to the lives of our learners. Let’s make sure they’re great drivers.