Share Your Voice on edCircuit

Teacher In-Service Focuses on New Priorities

Teacher in-service is expanding beyond curriculum and instruction as educators prepare for artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, student wellness, school safety, and the evolving demands of today's classrooms.

Teacher working on laptop and taking notes with colleagues in background and icons showing education priorities

Teacher in-service priorities for 2026: what research says works, what RAND found on AI training, and how to sort the list.

EdCircuit Staff wrote this in 2026 as Part 6 of a series on how teacher in-service has changed. A new section below adds research from 2017 to 2026 on how to choose among competing topics and what the evidence says about AI training for teachers.

Teacher in-service has always prepared educators for the year ahead.

But what teachers need to be prepared for today looks very different from what it did just a decade ago.

Imagine the opening morning of teacher in-service.

Ten years ago, the agenda likely included curriculum updates, classroom management strategies, instructional practices, assessment, and district initiatives. Those sessions helped educators prepare for the students who would soon walk through their classroom doors.

Today’s agenda often looks very different.

Artificial intelligence.

Cybersecurity.

Student data privacy.

Behavioral threat assessment.

Mental health.

Digital citizenship.

Accessibility.

School safety.

The profession has not simply changed.

The expectations placed on educators have expanded dramatically.

Teacher in-service has evolved because teaching itself has evolved.

Teaching Is More Complex Than Ever

Teachers still design engaging lessons, assess student learning, and build meaningful relationships.

Today, they also help students navigate artificial intelligence, recognize misinformation, model responsible technology use, respond to mental health concerns, protect student information, communicate with families across multiple digital platforms, and contribute to creating safe school environments.

Few professions have experienced this level of transformation in such a short period of time.

Professional learning has expanded because the profession itself has expanded.

Teachers Wear More Hats Than Ever Before

Ask teachers to describe their job today, and most would mention far more than instruction.

They are educators.

Mentors.

Technology facilitators.

Digital citizenship role models.

Safety partners.

Collaborators.

Family communicators.

Problem solvers.

Lifelong learners.

Each of those responsibilities requires new knowledge and new skills.

Teacher in-service is no longer designed solely to improve classroom instruction.

It is designed to help educators succeed in every aspect of their profession.

Artificial Intelligence Is Creating New Opportunities

Few topics have reshaped professional learning as quickly as artificial intelligence.

Districts are helping educators explore how AI can support lesson planning, differentiate instruction, generate formative assessments, streamline administrative work, and personalize student learning.

At the same time, professional learning helps teachers understand AI’s limitations.

Questions surrounding ethics, bias, academic integrity, student privacy, and responsible classroom implementation have become essential conversations.

Teacher in-service is no longer asking whether educators should understand AI.

It is helping them understand how to use it thoughtfully and responsibly.

Technology Created New Responsibilities

The digital transformation of education has introduced remarkable opportunities.

It has also introduced entirely new responsibilities.

Cybersecurity has become everyone’s responsibility—not just the technology department’s.

Teachers receive training on phishing attacks, password security, multi-factor authentication, ransomware awareness, and protecting student information because a single mistake can affect an entire school district.

Student data privacy has become equally important.

Every digital platform teachers use collects information.

Professional learning helps educators understand how to protect that information while maintaining student trust.

Technology changed education.

Teacher in-service changed with it.

Supporting the Whole Student

Perhaps the most significant shift has been the growing emphasis on student wellness.

Today’s educators increasingly participate in professional learning related to mental health awareness, trauma-informed practices, social-emotional learning, behavioral intervention, belonging, and recognizing when students may need additional support.

Teachers are not expected to become counselors.

They are expected to notice.

To care.

To respond appropriately.

To connect students with the professionals who can help.

Professional learning provides the confidence to do exactly that.

Safety Is More Than Emergency Drills

School safety has also evolved.

Years ago, safety training often centered on emergency procedures and annual compliance requirements.

Today’s professional learning is much broader.

Educators participate in learning related to behavioral threat assessment, emergency communication, reunification planning, laboratory safety, situational awareness, de-escalation strategies, transportation safety, and creating school environments where students feel physically and emotionally safe.

Safety has become part of everyday school culture.

Teacher in-service reinforces that culture throughout the year.

Preparing Students for a Digital World

Today’s students are growing up in a world where technology influences nearly every aspect of life.

Knowing how to use technology is no longer enough.

Students must learn how to use it responsibly.

Teacher in-service increasingly prepares educators to teach digital citizenship, media literacy, online safety, respectful communication, misinformation awareness, and responsible artificial intelligence use.

These are not simply technology skills.

They are life skills.

Schools are preparing students for a future that will demand both digital competence and ethical decision-making.

Preparing for Constant Change

Perhaps the greatest difference between today’s professional learning and that of the past is the pace of change.

Ten years ago, districts might introduce one or two major initiatives during the school year.

Today, new technologies, instructional practices, safety guidance, state requirements, and emerging challenges appear almost continuously.

Professional learning can no longer be limited to preparing educators once each August.

It must become continuous.

Teacher in-service is increasingly designed to help educators adapt, learn, and grow throughout the entire school year rather than during a handful of scheduled professional development days.

Looking Ahead

Preparing educators has never been about predicting the future.

It has always been about preparing them to meet it.

The expanding focus of teacher in-service reflects one simple reality.

Teaching is no longer defined by delivering instruction alone.

Today’s educators inspire learning, guide technology use, support student well-being, protect sensitive information, strengthen school safety, build meaningful relationships, and prepare students for a rapidly changing world.

Professional learning has grown because the profession has grown.

That evolution will continue.

The future of teacher in-service will not simply introduce educators to new topics.

It will help them confidently navigate whatever innovations, opportunities, and challenges come next.

As education continues changing, one thing remains constant.

The success of every school still depends on the people standing in front of students each day—and teacher in-service will continue evolving to ensure those educators are prepared for whatever tomorrow brings.


The Future of Professional Learning Series

Part 1: Teacher In-Service Has Changed

Part 2: Teacher In-Service Beyond the Auditorium

Part 3: Teacher In-Service Is No Longer One Size Fits All

Part 4: Teacher In-Service Meets Microlearning

Part 5: Teacher In-Service and Artificial Intelligence

Part 6: Teacher In-Service Focuses on New Priorities (Current Article)

Coming Next: Teacher In-Service Is Becoming Data Driven — exploring how districts are using learning analytics, certification tracking, AI, and professional learning platforms to build smarter, more responsive professional development.

Teacher in-service priorities for 2026: how districts can choose among AI, privacy, safety and wellness

Teacher in-service priorities have multiplied, as the article above shows, and the practical problem for a district is choosing which topics receive real time and which receive a short briefing. A school year has a limited number of professional learning hours, so a longer list does not by itself mean better preparation. This section looks at what research says makes professional development work, what recent evidence shows about AI training in particular, and how a leader might sort the list.

What makes professional learning effective, whatever the topic

In 2017 the Learning Policy Institute published a review by Linda Darling-Hammond, Maria Hyler and Madelyn Gardner of 35 studies of teacher professional development. The review identified seven features of effective programs: a focus on content, active learning, collaboration, models of effective practice, coaching and expert support, feedback and reflection, and sustained duration. These features apply to any topic on the in-service agenda. A one-hour session on data privacy that includes no practice and no follow-up has few of them, while a monthly team routine in which teachers try a practice and bring back examples has most of them. The review is a synthesis of studies with differing designs, so it supports a direction for planning more than a precise formula.

What the evidence shows about AI training

AI is the topic changing fastest. A 2025 EdWeek report on RAND research found that the share of districts training teachers on generative AI rose from 23 percent in fall 2023 to 48 percent in fall 2024. Nearly 67 percent of low-poverty districts had introduced training, compared with 39 percent of high-poverty districts. Early sessions mostly addressed teachers’ concerns, explained how AI works and where it falls short, and in some cases gave teachers time to experiment. The coverage says RAND drew on district surveys and interviews with 14 district leaders, and the EdWeek coverage reports no clear links yet between greater reliance on AI tools and higher-quality teaching or learning.

Teacher use is already common. A Gallup survey of 2,232 public school teachers fielded in March and April 2025 found that six in 10 had used an AI tool for their work in 2024-25. Teachers who used AI weekly estimated they saved 5.9 hours a week. These are the teachers’ own estimates, and the survey shows an association, not proof that AI caused better work. A 2026 FullScale field scan of rural schools found professional learning often took the form of one-time sessions or informal sharing, and quoted a district leader saying it is hard to run training when the tools change every week. Taken together, the findings suggest that AI training needs to be repeated and tied to classroom use, and that districts with fewer resources may need help catching up.

A way to sort the list

Leaders can sort in-service topics into three groups. The first group is compliance or safety topics that every adult in the building must hear, such as cybersecurity habits and emergency procedures. A short, well-prepared session with a clear checklist usually suits these topics, and teachers should be told what is required and why. The second group is topics that change daily teaching, such as AI tools, digital citizenship and supporting students’ well-being. These deserve the seven features above, including time to practice with colleagues and coaching afterward. The third group is topics a few teachers need now, which can be offered by choice or through a team.

Two checks keep the plan honest. First, ask teachers before the year starts which topics they feel least prepared for, and compare that list with the district’s. Second, decide in advance what change in practice would show a session worked, such as a sample of lesson plans or a short teacher survey, and look for it a few weeks later. Without that check, a calendar full of topics can be reported as complete while classrooms stay the same.

Readers following this series can compare these ideas with Part 5 on AI and with edCircuit’s professional development guide.

Subscribe to edCircuit to stay up to date on all of our shows, podcasts, news, and thought leadership articles.

More on Professional Development

  • Editorial team, edCircuit

    edCircuit is a mission-based organization entirely focused on the K-20 EdTech Industry and emPowering the voices that can provide guidance and expertise in facilitating the appropriate usage of digital technology in education. Our goal is to elevate the voices of today’s innovative thought leaders and edtech experts. Subscribe to receive notifications in your inbox

    View all posts
Share
Share Your Voice on edCircuit

More from edCircuit

Subscribe to edCircuit

Get the latest research, ideas, and stories delivered to your inbox.

Cancel
-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00